Comparative Ethics
Ethics and Freedom
Ø Freedom is the desire for man to have control over
himself and over his affairs
Ø Ethics recognizes man’s freedom in as much as such
freedom does not contradict the routines and duties of the official codes
Ø The promotion of fundamental freedom and rights of man
is the foundation of ethics. These rights are those which are not inimical to
either the organization or fellow men
Ø On this note, ethics does not contradict certain basic
rights of man which are irreducible and of universal application according to
the UN Human Rights Principles. These are right to life, ownership of property,
freedom of worship, association, etc
Ø However, these rights and freedom are restricted
within certain conditions, codes and legal principles
Ethics and Justice
Ø Justice is the right administration or application of
law (ethics)
Ø The conceptual understanding of justice is peculiar to
individuals. What justice means to the employer is not what it means to the
employee. What it means to an accused/defendant is not what it means to the
prosecutor.
Ø So, the measure of justice or the means through which
it is administered determines it’s nature. Justice can be divided into: formal
and substantive
Ø Formal justice has to do with strict application of
ethical standards. It doesn’t give room for alternative considerations or
examination of facts. The proponents of formal justice claim it is impartial
and clear for everyone to understand.
Ø So, formal justice exists in as much as it’s founding principles
are extant. Until a law or ethical principle is repealed, formal justice shall
continue to exist
Ø Substantive justice applies to a situation where extra
judicial or legal alternatives are explored in the interpretation of the law.
Ø Here, justice is secured based on the doctrine of
equity or what lawyers call judicial activism.
Ø Justices secured or established through this means
becomes itself a law known as case laws.
Ø Scholars have criticized substantive justice because
it gives room for undue interference of biases and sentiments
Ethics and Law
Law is a set of rules and regulations that guide the
activities of a given people
Law is cohesive which means it is binding on the
people that made it. You cannot be a member of a state and refuse to follow the
laws of the state
Law is a product of consensus. This means that people
make laws for themselves. Ethics is not so because, organizations create
ethical principles for the workers. They don’t have any input to make in such
ethical standards. They only work according to it and obey its tenets
Formal ethics is written. There is no unwritten formal
ethics. It must be contained in official documents, white papers, etc.
Nice one bro
ReplyDeleteThanks Sir.
Delete